Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Unmanly Man, Unwomanly Woman

Dad came home an hour ago, he sat down at the sofa, looked at mom and told her that it wasn’t a women who has got undressed and videoed by the Syrian policemen yesterday at the police station, it was a man with women organs.

There was silence in the living room. Mom said: "still, he is a humane being, he was mistreated". Dad told us that the reason why the police men undressed the man is because he was hunting men on the street for business. I asked dad, would the policemen undress a woman hunting for business and take pictures of her naked? No, they won't, for then it would be a question of "honour" not ethics. If it was a question of ethics, this man would not have got undressed, but because he has no "honour" to guard, let's take off his clothes and take photos of him to laugh at.

Is it the confusion about his sex, or our limited understanding to human rights, that triggers them to dehumanize the man?

Isn’t this also discrimination? Against those whom we cannot define?

You know what's sad, I ended up fighting with dad and mom, for to them, it’s not racism, and it's just unethical. We agree it was unethical and inhumane, but why did this happen to him? and would it happen to a manly man and a womanly woman? What they pictured was his organs, and what they laughed about is that he is both/neither a man or a woman, so it is his very case that caused this very inhumane treatment, Hence it is discrimination, it is racism. This was not just an unethical act, this was a racist act. It reflects a way of thinking on people we cannot project our labels on them, they are not part of our system hence we exclude them from our rules and reject their humane rights.

It is not enough to sympathize with victims, if we want to be just with the man, let's regain his rights when admitting the very reason why we dehumanized him in the first place. When we do, we hope he forgives our gay thinking one day.

I think it is a case of sexism as well..

8 comments:

DUBAI JAZZ said...

Am I missing something here? how is it that we are not able to define them? I always thought they are called 'shemales'?

Golaniya said...

You're right, DJ, we do have a "name" for "them," we should all go home now.

7aki Fadi said...

I really like this post.
I agree with you 100%

I don't mean to be annoying but the blog header you say Decentering it is actually spelled Decentring :D .

Cool blog, I will definitely follow it now.

Golaniya said...

Hey thanks! I believe you know Lebanese NightS, she was kind enough to help me downloading the template :-)
I think the correct word is "decentralizing". I think we cannot add "ing/de" to "centre" nor to "center". But "decentralizing" is so heavy, I just came up with a lighter word, I find it harmless to come up with an English of my own ;-)
Cool blog you got there as well, we seem to share some thoughts.

saint said...

This post is one of kind, which touches on subject everyone shrugs at, and wants to hide it under the rug. I actuality think that such subjects expose ourselves and our prejudice by nature and how we find hard time defending human rights in general. When “what called normal people” their human rights violated, (which is not clear what are they in Syria yet), like freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of expression, freedom of privacy …, , Shaming them in a way or another, or calling them traitors by authority is the easiest way to silence them. And when authorities violate people rights and then find themselves mistaken, the guy has to accept his luck with no compensation. The person who has been violated has nowhere to go to protest that. In court they may laugh at him and he will get nothing for his humiliation, because human dignity has no value in this society. While on the book, if he insulted an official or the country military dress and so on, he will rotten in prison and pays a fine. Make you wonder when French revolution values will reach this country.

Golaniya said...

Saint,
The reason why I have found this incident troubling is because the authority is not just Syrian policemen, but every Syrian citizen. Authorities have their own interests, opposition is there to stop them, or try to. But what if authority becomes people? becomes those very oppressed people by "authority"? becomes fathers and mothers?
Women are triply oppressed, once by the patriarchal society, second by patriarchal understanding of religion, third by State's authority. Same with undefined citizens and un-familiar citizens, with un-Syrian Syrians, they are also double oppressed, once by their government, second by their own people.
So it is not just a question of political authority, policemen here in the post, it is a question of ethics, morals and humanity. It's not just our regime that is tyrannical, it's our minds, every mind. We cannot recognize difference. Hence the battle becomes harder, and alienating.

saint said...

This is what I read today on the global voices:
خطفت اليوم ركانة حمور من أمام منزلها

لدى عودة ركانة حمور مع اطفالها ( خمس سنوات و سبعة سنوات و تسعة سنوات ) و لدى توقفها بسيارتها امام باب البناية و انزال اطفالها هجم عليها حوال ستة رجال قاموا بدفع أولادها عنها بوحشية و قاموا باغتصاب حريتها بقوة و دفعوها بعنف الى داخل سيارة مدنية ذات نمرة طرطوس و منعوا احدا من الاقتراب منها و انطلقت السيارة بسرعة دون التعريف عن مكان التوجه او مصدر الاشخاص و يذكر انها قد تلقت منذ يومين تقريبا تهديدا من قبل الامن السياسي الفرع الداخلي بدمشق انهم يريدون التحقيق معها و لما رفضت الذهاب الى التحقيق دون ان تتسلم بطاقة استدعاء قانونية و نظامية قاموا اليوم باختطافها باسلوب العصابات

Golaniya said...

Yeah, Saint, I posted about it on my blog.